I was speaking with a colleague earlier this week who wants to set up a tax storefront. That means a place that prepares taxes, probably only individual taxes and only for a few months a year. Think H&R Block, but without a franchise involved. I suspect he would be successful, but like any business start-up the cash drain is difficult to pull off.
And he asked me if tax seasons are getting “harder.” Yes, he is younger than me. I am getting to that age.
I hesitated on his question, as my long-standing position is that the accounting firm determines the difficulty of the season for its employees. Some firms do a good job, and other firms simply do not care. It is one of the reasons that the average career of an accountant in a CPA firm is little more than that of an NFL player.
Bet you did not know that.
Still, there are issues for tax practitioners that did not exist a few years ago – or even last year.
I was speaking this week with a good friend about whether it was safe for him to prepare his personal tax return on TurboTax. Depending upon the year and other factors, he prepares a draft return and I review it for him. Last year he changed jobs and states, so I expect I will review his return this year.
Why TurboTax? It turns out that a number of states experienced suspicious electronic filing activity this year and, upon investigation, in many cases the electronic return was filed using TurboTax.
Let’s be fair, though. That does not mean that the information came from TurboTax. There have enough recent breeches of data security that the information may have come from elsewhere.
Intuit, the parent of TurboTax, responded aggressively to this development, as you would imagine. A number of states, including Kentucky and Minnesota, temporarily halted the processing of electronically filed returns. Meanwhile TurboTax encouraged its customers to log-in and review their accounts. They instructed their customers to review their direct-deposit information specifically.
Why the states? In the past, fraudsters have targeted the IRS rather heavily. The IRS responded with stricter identity measures, including lockdowns on any tax refunds and the required use of security passwords. Florida was so hard-hit, for example, that one can request a federal security PIN number under a pilot program – even if one was not the victim of identity theft.
It may be that the fraudsters saw easier picking elsewhere.
Then we have the information documents to prepare a tax return.
I am reading that the federal health insurance marketplace has sent out approximately 800,000 erroneous Forms 1095-A. This is not insignificant and represents approximately one-in-five people using the marketplace. These forms are new and are issued by the exchanges to individuals who purchased insurance there. They include information on any government subsidy, so they are an important tax document. For example, even if you are not otherwise required to file a tax return, you must file if you received a subsidy.
The error concerns the “benchmark plan” premium and doesn’t concern the amount of subsidy itself. The “benchmark plan”” is the second lowest cost silver plan for where one lives, and it is part of the arithmetic to settle-up whether one received too much or too little subsidy. As you know, if you received too much subsidy you have to pay it back.
Taxpayers who received Forms 1095-A are encouraged to wait until March before filing their individual tax returns. Not a problem. Surely these are people who do even meet with their tax advisors until March.
Meanwhile, it has finally dawned on some politicians that people may not realize the effect of ObamaCare on them until they file their 2014 taxes. There will be rude surprises for those who did not acquire insurance and now have to pay the penalty. Perhaps they acquired insurance but were over-subsidized, and now they have to repay the excess subsidy.
Wait until they learn that the penalty will go up every year.
Then there is a problem with the timing of obtaining health insurance. ObamaCare requires everyone to have insurance in place by February 15 – which of course is two months earlier than April 15, when taxes are due. That may be the first time people understand this Rube Goldberg contraption foisted 50-shades-of-grey style upon society. What happens then? Well, in addition to owing the penalty for 2014 it would appear that one would also owe a penalty for some part of 2015 – at least until one can acquire health insurance. The penalty goes month by month.
Many politicos – not the brightest class emerging from natural selection – are now up in arms, demanding that deadlines be changed, penalties ameliorated and so on. I suppose there is a nuance there, but it escapes me.
Somewhat on cue, on February 20 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services declaimed that the enrollment period shall reopen from March 15 to April 30.
To which I have two questions:
- What happened to the period from February 15 to March 15?
- Why is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services changing the law?
On February 13 - which seems a lifetime ago at this point - the IRS finally provided some guidance on how to comply with the new repair Regulations effective with the 2014 tax returns. Considering that their first pass at the Regulations required almost everyone with real estate or other depreciable property to file for a change in accounting method - a change which the IRS mandated, by the way - the IRS then had the temerity to say that we also had to formally ask them for permission to change. I had and have a stack of real estate partnership returns in my office waiting on their guidance. Forests have been felled by tax practitioners divining for weeks and months what the IRS wanted from us this year in order to comply with their new Regulations.
Do you ever wonder if our government is suffocating under the weight of people who - having accomplished little more than going to a name school or playing at politics - think they now have the chops to bludgeon those of us who actually accomplish something every day?
Back to our initial question though: are tax seasons getting “harder?”
I don’t think “harder” is the word I would use for for it.
About the author
Steven D. Hamilton is a career CPA, with extensive experience involving all aspects of tax practice, including sophisticated income tax planning and handling of tax controversy matters for closely-held businesses and high-income individuals.